Contact
Reading · 4 min
Marketing

This just in: Unattainable body ideals are no longer for women alone

Vogue Business data shows plus-size representation on men's runways has flatlined at 0.2-0.3% for three years, while the male ideal splits into two unachievable extremes: emaciated-thin and pharmaceutically jacked. It's not a health conversation, it's manufactured insecurity, and it's a wide open lane for brands who market to the healthy, functional middle instead.

This just in: Unattainable body ideals are no longer for women alone

We’re so used to the conversation surrounding unattainable body images, toxic standards, and size inclusivity being treated almost exclusively as a women’s marketing issue.

And fair, it’s mostly disproportionate.

But as Vogue Business recently laid bare, men are no longer immune to these volatile shifts. The current menswear landscape is both ignoring the average paying customer while also weaponising a radical, highly online subculture to rewrite the rules of the male silhouette.

Let's look at the data behind this shift, which is, staggering, to say the least.

Across three years and seven consecutive seasons of sizing reports, the representation of plus-size bodies on the men’s runway has not only slowed down, but completely flatlined. In fact, it's stagnated at a microscopic 0.2% to 0.3%.

This isn’t, however, just a case of a lack of bigger bodies on the catwalk.

It's the aggressive divergence of the male physical ideal into two unachievable extremes.

On one side of the venue, you have emaciated, ultra-slim models getting visibly thinner. On the other side, fuelled by the explosive mainstreaming of the digital "looksmaxxing" movement, there’s been a surge in hyper-muscular, jacked models poured into second-skin separates and short shorts. All designed to showcase bulging quads and extreme vascularity.

But, allow me to look past the glamour of the runway and call this exactly what it is: the corporate commodification of male insecurity.

Really, it’s got nothing to do with health, and little to do with celebrating the reality of human form. It’s a commercial strategy designed to ensure that the modern male consumer remains in a perpetual state of physical inadequacy.

Ah, the playbook as old as time itself.

The corporate machine knows that a content, physically stable man is a terrible consumer.

If you are satisfied with your reflection and your health baseline, you don't buy the hyper-specific lifestyle apparel. You don't subscribe to the optimisation apps. And you certainly don't look for medical shortcuts.

The runway has never been based on reality, let’s be honest. But pulling it away even further, fashion houses are setting an unattainable standard. One that is fundamentally unachievable for a normal, healthy individual through standard nutrition and traditional training.

The male body ideal now requires a pharmaceutical helping hand. That may mean leveraging GLP-1 agonists to hit extreme leanness. Or it may involve cycling through peptides and performance enhancers to hold unnatural muscle mass.

This isn't an argument for swing-the-pendulum body positivity that dismisses the genuine health risks of obesity. It is a plea for basic baseline fkn sanity.

Because this is what happens when you allow the market to turn our literal human skeleton into a passing seasonal trend.

One year the corporate consensus tells men to be lean and angular; the next, the algorithm demands they look like an action figure forged in iron. We are treating the human physique with the same disposable, transactional logic we apply to fast fashion.

The only way to get off this god-forsaken ride is to recognise the commercial blueprint for what it is. That, and refusing to validate it with our attention or our wallets.

Brands are moving the goalposts. Because they know men are finally insecure enough to chase them.

For brands, the contrarian opportunity here is massive. The market is rapidly hitting a point of profound exhaustion with manufactured dysmorphia.

These brands catering to extreme ideological body scripts on either end of the spectrum are not doing themselves or the world any favours. The businesses, however, that possess the supreme operational confidence to market to the healthy, functional middle (aka, the real, paying customers who want clothes that fit a human life, not a pharmaceutical cycle, hello?) are doing both.

Stop letting a handful of luxury designers and an interest-based algorithm dictate what your genetic baseline should look like.

Step away from the freaking the optimisation metrics. Turn away from the extreme runway circus. And remember that your body is a vessel for your life, not a temporary marketing asset for a fashion house.

-Sophie Randell, Writer

Filed underMarketing
Sophie Rose

Sophie Rose

Lead Writer

Resident writer here at TAS, and professional overthinker of all things culture, media and marketing. Every day, I sacrifice my sanity to try and make sense of the internet, so you don’t have to. I know, gods work, right?If you’re into razor sharp takes, weird cultural rabbit holes, and the kind of analysis that feels like grabbing coffee with that friend who can’t help going on a tangent, then you're going to love me.

More by Sophie
Originally published in Your Attention Please · 12 jul 2026

Get the next issue, before everyone else.

27,000 readers · sent every Friday at 7am NZT · always free